<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>sprocket i/o - Latest Comments in String concatenation performance in Python</title><link>http://sprocket-io.disqus.com/</link><description>open-source, motorcycles, moving to belgium</description><atom:link href="https://sprocket-io.disqus.com/string_concatenation_performance_in_python/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:44:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: String concatenation performance in Python</title><link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2007/10/string-concatenation-performance-in-python/#comment-67972402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What are those tutorials stands for? Believe me I was unable to understand those.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Swing Sets</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: String concatenation performance in Python</title><link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2007/10/string-concatenation-performance-in-python/#comment-67512556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for those information. They might be needed for me. So, I have bookmarked this site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">No Bite Flea and Tick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: String concatenation performance in Python</title><link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2007/10/string-concatenation-performance-in-python/#comment-49432527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I added another test for Python 2.6, hoping that a method format would be a silver bullet. Indeed, it turned out to be the slowest of all.&lt;br&gt;'method_format': "x = '{a:s}{b:s}{c:s}{d:s}'.format(a=a, b=b, c=c, d=d)"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew V</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 20:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>