<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>sprocket i/o - Latest Comments in Oh Camel!</title><link>http://sprocket-io.disqus.com/</link><description>open-source, motorcycles, moving to belgium</description><atom:link href="http://sprocket-io.disqus.com/oh_camel/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:06:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Oh Camel!</title><link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2006/01/oh-camel/#comment-4173234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you can learn scheme language,a functional programming language and the queen of programming languages .&lt;br&gt;    Scheme is a statically scoped and properly tail-recursive dialect of the Lisp programming language. It was designed to have an exceptionally clear and simple semantics and few different ways to form expressions. A wide variety of programming paradigms including imperative,functional,and message passing styles,find convenivent expression in Scheme.I am learning it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">009</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Camel!</title><link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2006/01/oh-camel/#comment-4173233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I vote for you checking out Nemerle next.  I didn't see much need for it over C#, but maybe you could explain it to me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;C# 3.0's type inference, from what I can tell, is strictly compile-time inference and doesn't do much other than save you a word of two of typing when declaring variables.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mikey Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:06:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Camel!</title><link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2006/01/oh-camel/#comment-4173232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because Forth's best-known customers (Apple) is moving away from it? :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The OCaml guy in my programming language class informed me that it lets you reuse C functions quite easily as well (better than JNI, certainly, which even Java programmers are abandoning), so seems like you made a good choice there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Microsoft's starting to buy into FP, which is quite encouraging.. it might finally take off (C# 3.0 will have anonymous functions and type inferencing; C-omega, the research language, also has this cool idea called streams. Both still do not optimize tail calls, alas).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Camel!</title><link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2006/01/oh-camel/#comment-4173231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about FORTH man? ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 06:22:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
